New product introduction – NPI – is the ultimate team sport.
From the procurement agent’s position, NPI in the electronics industry covers everything from setting quality and budget goals to deciding component and cable suppliers. The goal is to seamlessly integrate product design, development, and manufacturing to meet regulatory standards and satisfy the end user.
Your understanding of the sourcing side of electronics manufacturing NPI can impact the project’s development cost, quality, and time to market.
There are six places your team may be able to improve new-product introduction processes for a faster, safer launch:
In the 2020s, a string of serious supply chain disruptions caused component purchasers to rethink the true cost of doing business. Many buyers have found that risks are riskier now, especially when holding out for the lowest possible price.
If the project is all about price, then you’re basically telling the parties involved that you’re willing to sacrifice quality. And besides, there’s much more to electronic component costs than the sticker price.
As the company puts its reputation on the line with a new product, consider these cases where paying more for parts may be worth it:
Even if your parts are coming from the world’s most reliable distributors or manufacturers, you should verify that the maker has a strict inspection process.
To help production advance smoothly, you can be ready to hand over a thorough bill of materials (BOM). You should already have the product’s design files, material makeup, and testing validation in hand before attempting a BOM. The document should include:
A wisely thought-out BOM can promote quality and reduce error risk throughout all production stages.
Seamless stocking and inventory is the backbone of any good product introduction procedure. The price might be great, but if you can’t get the new parts on time … what’s the point?
Every electronics procurement person wants to know how soon they can get the necessary parts and start production. There are more influences on product flow, however, than simple supply-and-demand:
Inside your own building, design, engineering, manufacturing, and marketing team members can speed up go-to-market time by simply improving communication. Getting a feel for each department’s perspectives and underlying goals can result in less confusion, fewer redos, and a clearer path to launch.
Your choice of electronic components should align with the product’s past, present, and future.
Physical dimensions and mounting types need to match the product design specifications to prevent mechanical integration issues. If it doesn’t fit the footprint, the purchase you thought would save $250,000 might force the engineers to totally redesign the board.
Components also need to play well with each other. A component’s temperature rating and dissipation needs can affect performance in other areas of the assembly. All parts should also have the proper rating for electrical properties like:
Futureproofing the design is another great way to boost cost-effectiveness in the long run. When possible, buy components that are compatible with emerging technologies. This will extend the product's market relevance and make it easier to update it. Sourcing modular components that are physically easy to replace or upgrade can add further value without requiring a full redesign.
Sustainability has been a trendy design word for decades, but unlike other trends, it’s not going away.
Today there are more eyes than ever – both from the public and regulatory agencies – on the eco-friendliness of products and practices. In the electronics manufacturing world, you can foster a “green” brand in several ways:
Supplyframe’s new Product Carbon Footprint tool is an interesting option for watching where you step. It provides manufacturers instant access to data for over 300 million electronic parts, helping users quickly vet whether they meet emissions goals. |
Eco-consciousness goes from “nice to have” to “must-have” in the presence of hazardous materials. Noncompliance can lead to fines, recalls, or bans in certain markets, emphasizing the importance of sourcing components that meet these standards.
There are two sets of material regulations that dominate the conversation worldwide:
RoHS |
REACH |
|
What It Covers |
Electronic products |
All markets |
Who It Affects |
Anyone selling to the EU market |
Anyone exporting to or manufacturing in the EU |
Restricted Materials |
• Lead • Mercury • Cadmium • Hexavalent chromium • PBB & PBDE retardants • Several phthalates |
• Carcinogens, mutagens, & reproductive toxins • Degradation-resistant toxins • Endocrine disruptors & other human dangers |
Substances Covered |
10 |
241 |
RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) limits dangerous substances in electronic and electrical equipment. When you see a CE mark on an electronic product, you know it meets RoHS standards. These mandates originated in the European Union, but also apply to U.S. (and any other) manufacturers selling to EU markets.
REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals) addresses the chemicals in finished products and the processes used to make them. Like with RoHS, there’s little point in manufacturing a REACH-unfriendly product, no matter where you do business.
OEMs sourcing for a new product can stay out of trouble by:
In the literal sense, “putting your eggs in one basket” has its perks. You’ll know exactly where all the eggs are, and you won’t have to pay for extra baskets.
On the other hand, spreading those eggs out gives you a safety net. If one basket breaks or disappears, you’ve still got plenty of eggs safely nestled in other baskets.
Finding supply streams for a product design can feel like a highly competitive Easter egg hunt, with some of the same pros and cons:
Criteria |
Single-Sourcing |
Multisourcing |
Pricing |
• Bulk-order discounts • Lower overhead costs |
• Lower pricing through supplier competition • Higher overhead costs |
Management |
• Simplified – one contract, schedule & relationship |
• Trickier & more time-consuming to juggle multiple partnerships |
Risk |
• Higher due to dependency on one supplier for delivery, quality |
• Fewer shortages • Greater flexibility to respond to market changes |
Quality |
• Limited exposure to tech innovations, part improvements |
• Broader access to new technology • May be quality variations across suppliers |
When in doubt, think of the “soft costs” of leaning on a specific source. In this era of supply uncertainty, it’s almost always advantageous to bring multiple manufacturers into the mix. A distributor adds value here by making a broader span of options more accessible. Occasionally, a distributor will even recommend multisourcing at the distributor level.
It’s no secret why manufacturers prefer sourcing from overseas: lower prices.
However, most aspects of offshore sourcing also come with greater risk:
Offshoring used to be a no-brainer cost-saving strategy, and still can be if you use
it wisely. However, differences in business philosophies and practices may add risk to an already-risky product launch.
Give some real thought to what’s going into the next-gen version of your company’s prized product line.
Settling for aging, cheap products can create a chain reaction of costs. Remove end-of-life and “not recommended for new design life cycle” parts completely out of the design. A distributor with forecasting tools and strong market knowledge can help you identify and avoid these parts.
And if you make just one change from the above tips, consider at least dual-sourcing! Keeping your electronics supply options open and agile will benefit the entire new-product introduction process.