PFAS Compliance: What Sourcing Teams Should Be Doing Now

PFAS compliance is quickly becoming a sourcing priority. These long-lasting chemicals – often used in cable insulation and jacketing – are under increasing scrutiny from regulators, investors, and end users. What was once a niche environmental topic is now a serious sourcing challenge.

New rules are emerging at both the federal and state levels in the U.S., and similar changes are underway globally. Companies that source wire and cable are being asked to track what's in their products and prove it. That puts pressure on procurement, even if you're not the one selecting the materials.

Understanding PFAS compliance doesn’t require a chemistry degree. It just takes awareness, the right questions, and a willingness to act before the regulations catch up to you.

What Are PFAS? And Why Are They So Hard to Phase Out?

PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances – a large group of synthetic chemicals known for being extremely durable. They’ve been widely used in manufacturing since the 1940s, especially in products that need to resist heat, water, oil, or chemicals. That includes everything from nonstick cookware to rain jackets to wire insulation.

What makes PFAS useful in industry is the same thing that makes them a problem: they don’t break down easily. These compounds can linger in soil, water, and organisms for decades. That’s why they’re often called “forever chemicals.”

There are thousands of PFAS, but a few, like PFOA, PFOS, and GenX, have received the most attention. Studies link exposure to certain PFAS with health issues such as cancer, liver damage, thyroid disorders, and immune system effects. Because of this, regulators are starting to treat PFAS as a class of concern, not just as individual compounds.

Where PFAS Show Up in Cables & Wire

PFAS compounds aren’t there by accident. They’ve long been prized in wire and cable insulation, jacketing, and coatings. Materials like PTFE, FEP, and ETFE (often marketed under trade names like Teflon®) offer serious performance advantages: high resistance to heat, chemicals, and electrical stress. That made them ideal for use in aerospace, medical devices, industrial automation, and other high-stakes environments.

The problem now is twofold. First, PFAS content isn’t always disclosed in supplier documentation. It might not be listed in the spec sheet, even though it’s there. Second, replacing PFAS-based materials isn’t simple. Alternatives often involve trade-offs – like reduced durability, higher cost, or the need to requalify components under new certifications.

What’s Changing: The Regulatory Landscape

PFAS regulations are beginning to take shape in ways that directly impact sourcing. Agencies in the U.S. and around the world are moving forward with restrictions, reporting rules, and product-level requirements. Cable and wire materials are increasingly part of that focus. Here’s what to watch:

In the U.S.:

• EPA PFAS Strategic Roadmap (2021–2024): A federal plan that laid the groundwork for stronger PFAS regulation through testing, cleanup, and reporting requirements. While the original roadmap has concluded, many of its initiatives – such as TSCA reporting rules and enforcement actions – are now being implemented.
  
  
• TSCA Reporting Requirements (2023–2025): Under the Toxic Substances Control Act, manufacturers must report all PFAS use, intentional or not, going back to 2011. This includes low-volume use in coatings, insulation, or adhesives.
  
  
• State-Level Legislation:
  
  
  • Maine: Plans to ban most products containing intentionally added PFAS by 2030.
    
    
  • California: Requires PFAS labeling on many electronic devices and components.
    
    

Globally:

• EU REACH Proposal: A sweeping draft regulation could restrict more than 10,000 PFAS compounds under a single framework. A final decision is expected between 2025 and 2026, with potential ripple effects on any company selling into Europe.
  
  
• Other countries: Canada, Japan, and others are implementing their own PFAS controls, especially on imported industrial products that include high-performance plastics or coatings.
  
  

Already in Motion:

• Product recalls: Some manufacturers have already removed products from the market after PFAS content was flagged through compliance reviews, customer concerns, or material testing.
  
  
• Litigation: Legal risks are rising. Companies linked to PFAS use have faced lawsuits over environmental damage, health claims, and lack of disclosure. Even indirect supply chain involvement can carry risk.
  
  
• Supply chain audits: Regulators and major OEMs are asking for more detailed sourcing records. Full material declarations, third-party verification, and chemical traceability are becoming table stakes for continued business.
  
  

What Buyers and Sourcing Teams Should Be Thinking About

PFAS regulations are drawing sourcing teams into the conversation alongside engineering and legal. Even if you don’t work directly with cable material selection, you may be expected to evaluate supplier documentation, ask compliance-related questions, or identify gaps in traceability.

Here’s how to approach those responsibilities:

Start with the Right Questions

When reviewing products or speaking with vendors:

• Does the material contain PTFE, FEP, ETFE, or other fluoropolymers?
• Can the supplier provide a complete material declaration?
• Are compliance documents available for REACH, RoHS, or TSCA?
  
  

Watch for Gaps in Information

Inconsistent or incomplete answers may signal underlying risk. Be cautious if:

• “PFAS-free” is claimed without documentation
• Responses are vague or overly broad
• Compliance materials are missing or unavailable
  
  

Look for Signs of Proactive Risk Management

Suppliers who take PFAS compliance seriously often:

• Provide up-to-date documentation without delay
• Share detailed information about material composition
• Communicate steps they’re taking to transition away from high-risk compounds

Your Next Step: Preparing for a Post-PFAS Future

Many companies are waiting for PFAS regulations to become final before making changes. That delay could lead to compliance gaps, rushed decisions, or missed sourcing opportunities. There’s value in acting now, even if current materials are still technically allowed. Here are some things you can do now:

• Start by identifying high-risk product lines: Focus on those that rely on fluoropolymers like PTFE, FEP, or ETFE. These are often found in high-heat or chemical-resistant cable applications. Flagging them early gives your team time to evaluate substitutes before a phaseout deadline forces the issue.
• Strengthen your expectations for material traceability: If a supplier can’t provide basic documentation, such as material declarations or REACH/TSCA reports, that’s a concern. Ask about lot-level tracking, polymer content, and whether they’re prepared for evolving regional requirements.
• Track what you’re learning: Begin building internal records now. Document supplier communications, identify where documentation is missing, and begin mapping which vendors are best positioned to support a long-term transition.
  
  

PFAS Compliance Is Already Part of Sourcing

PFAS compliance is shaping how sourcing teams approach vendor selection, documentation, and risk. New regulations are raising expectations across the supply chain, and buyers are increasingly responsible for verifying what’s in the materials they manage.

Taking early steps now – asking sharper questions, reviewing documentation more closely, and tracking material risks – can help protect supply chains and keep projects moving. Staying ahead of PFAS compliance means making informed decisions before those decisions are forced on you.

Strengthen Your Sourcing Strategy

PFAS compliance is one piece of a broader sourcing strategy. Get the guide to prepare for what’s next in electronic component sourcing.